Jon,  I may be in the minority but I have to disagree with your comment 
' don't take the 0dB's into account '
While every attempt is made to design well below the limit, a pass is still 
a pass. It is my opinion that the standards bodies build in a 'measurement 
uncertainty' when creating the requirements. This is probably one of the 
factors contributing to their long incubation period.  In fact one lab in 
particular in the UK speaks about a +2, -3dB. limit. 
If everybody chooses to move the goal posts by creating de-facto 
requirements, then the game becomes very dull indeed.

Best regards
Barry Singleton
Approvals Specialist email:[email protected]
Securicor 3net Limited  
Ringway House Bell Road  
Daneshill  Basingstoke
Hants  RG24 8FB  UK  
Tel: 44 (0)1256 792174
-------------
Original Text
From: Jon Griver <[email protected]>, on 15/10/96 22:41:
Doug McKean wrote:

(Taken out of context)

>6dB would be comfortable.  
>Unfortunately, I have been in a lab that passed at only 0.5dB. 

There has been some confusion in this discussion between the test lab's
responsibilities and the manufacturer's responsibilities.

The test lab tests the sample(s) the manufacturer submits. The lab's
responsibility is to test the product in a professional manner according to
the standards requested by the manufacturer. A margin of 0dB is a pass and
the manufacturer has the right to expect the test lab to issue a pass test
report.

The manufacturer's responsibility is to comply with the EMC Directive (or
other regulations around the world). If the manufacturer does not realise
it, the lab should explain to him that a 0dB margin means that most likely 
a
large percentage of his production will be over the limit, and that he
should be aiming for a margin of xdB to give him a particular level of
confidence that his production complies.

Cynthia, when you do your statisitics, don't take the 0dB's into account, 
as
these do not refer to confidence margin, but to the test results of an
individual sample submitted to a test lab.


Jon Griver
ITL (Product Testing) Ltd.
[email protected]



Reply via email to