I no longer have a copy of the ground-start interface spec we once wrote in
Committee T1 but could swear that there was dialtone involved.  However,
I now understand what you mean by blind dialing.

This refers to terminal equipment that is not willing or able to detect
dial tone
and operates on the faint hope that after some time, any Central Office
will
eventually acknowledge a request for service and be able to receive address
signaling.

When the first automatic dialers were designed, there was no standard in 
Nprth America for dialtone and the range of signals that could be dial tone
was quite spread.  Therefore, all sorts of things that were not dialtone,
could 
be mistaken for dialtone.  There was a fear that a proliferation of these
blind dialers could start tying up Central Office Common equipment
resulting
in poorer service to customers that would not dial before they received
dialtone.

This never really happened because the COs all switched to standard
dialtone,
which makes dialtone detection much less ambiguous.  In addition, the cost
of
providing dialtone detection came down so far that it became a non-issue
for
any piece of equipment that was of "some" quality.


However, a new phenomenon is taking place, INTERNET.  I've been given to
understand that in some areas of the Silicon Valley, so many people are
tying
up their lines by sitting on the INTERNET, that one in 6 call attempts
fail, because
the CO does not return dialtone when a request for service is made.
(Central Offices are designed on well researched assumptions on how many of
the subscribers will be using the phone.  Not all subscribers can be served

simultanuously).

Even if the equipment could serve all subscribers, that would be sort of
pointless
because all the calling party would get would be a busy signal.  Will the
permanent
INTERNET users switch to their cable TV companies, for INTERNET service ???

For the time being, I would not invest a great deal of money in automatic
dialing
equipment that can not detect dial tone.  It may not be a viable product.


Ciao,


Vic

Reply via email to