The Advisory Notes are volontary and the manufacturer must declare if he meets them or not. This declaration will be one of the prerequisities in a future CTR 21 approval application. As far as I understand, the manufacturer must also inform the user about it (e.g. in the user's guide). This is actually under discussion as we speak (ACTE 40 meeting).
The advisory notes can be found in ETSI Guide DraftEG 201 121 V1.1.1 (1997-10). I'm not sure if this was the particular version accepted by ETSI last week or if there is a later version. If anyone knows, don't hesitate to contribute........ Roger Magnuson TGC AB -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 1997 08:37 To: [email protected]; [email protected]; GECAB/EST/ROGER Subject: Re[2]: TBR21 Adoption << File: UUCP_ENV.TXT >> Does this mean that these countries can now impose their additional country deviations to TBR21?? Tania Grant, Lucent Technologies, Octel Messaging Division [email protected] ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: RE: TBR21 Adoption Author: [email protected] at P_Internet_Mail List-Post: [email protected] Date: 12/17/97 8:12 PM I cannot guarantee 100% accuracy, but Germany, Belgium, Portugal and Norway voted NO and all others YES. Note that Norway and Switzerland are not EU members and their votes are not included in the figure for CTR decision. The final result was 76% (71% needed). Just for curiosity, Germany had promised to vote Yes if their Advisory Notes were accepted but they changed their vote anyway.......... Roger Magnuson TGC AB, Sweden Phone: +46 8 56250042 Direct: +46 8 56250050 Fax: +46 8 7050045 e-mail: [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 1997 19:11 To: [email protected]; GECAB/EST/ROGER Subject: Re: TBR21 Adoption << File: UUCP_ENV.TXT >> Hello tregers, Is there any TBR21 forum or Web site which shows the position of each country on the TBR21 ? Specially France and Germany ? I have not found this info on the ETSI Web site http://www.trac.org.uk/ although the CTR status on Dec 15,97 is clearly shown. Pierre-Marie Shiva International Senior Worlwide Approval Engineer tel : 33 4 92 96 80 42 fax : 33 4 92 96 80 01 RCIC - http://www.rcic.com Regulatory Compliance Information Center Received: from curly.eng.octel.com (148.147.200.26) by m-internet.corp.octel.com with SMTP (IMA Internet Exchange 2.1 Enterprise) id 0032EC13; Wed, 17 Dec 97 16:53:14 -0800 Received: from gw3.octel.com (gw3.octel.com [148.147.1.15]) by curly.eng.octel.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA11944; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 16:54:33 -0800 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by gw3.octel.com (8.6.10/8.6.12) id QAA01913; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 16:54:02 -0800 Received: from europe.std.com(199.172.62.20) by gw3.octel.com via smap (V1.3) id sma001759; Wed Dec 17 16:53:38 1997 Received: by europe.std.com (8.7.6/BZS-8-1.0) id TAA11464; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 19:45:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from world.std.com by europe.std.com (8.7.6/BZS-8-1.0) id TAA11446; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 19:45:21 -0500 (EST) From: [email protected] Received: from mn1.swip.net by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0) id AA06760; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 19:44:40 -0500 Received: by mn1.swip.net (8.8.8/2.01) id TAA13666; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 19:10:12 GMT Message-Id: <[email protected]> List-Post: [email protected] Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 20:12:43 +0100 To: [email protected], [email protected] Subject: RE: TBR21 Adoption X-Mailer: TFS Gateway V210U0720M Sender: [email protected] Precedence: list Reply-To: [email protected]
