Randy and Duane Hello,

I don't have my UL1459 handy, but if I recall correctly UL1459 also 
has the option of construction in lieu of testing or a combination of 
both construction and testing. Also UL1459 tests are similar to 
UL1950 except for the test equipment simulator fuse value, 1.6 A 
vs 2.0 A. Please correct me if I am wrong.

Also, I would like to take this opportunity to share with all treggers 
something I learnt over the past few years. A UL1950 3rd Edition 
modem (or  other UL1950 3rd Ed. telecom device) can be 
acccepted in a UL1459 end-product (eg rack system) but a UL1459 
compliant modem cannot be accepted in a UL1950 3rd Edition end-
product unless additionally evaluated for construction and/or testing.





Date sent:              Tue, 26 Jan 99 17:08:19 EST
To:                     <[email protected]>
From:                   "Randolph Ivans" <[email protected]>
Subject:                re: Ul 1459 Test Question
Send reply to:          [email protected]

> The tests are intended to deal with power system faults on the network. 
> These are known to happen and publications like UL1459, CSA225, 
> UL1950/CSA950 and Bellcore GR-1089-CORE all have requirements that address 
> this. In UL1459 the only option is testing. For your info, the test you 
> mention does have limiting....to 40A. I believe that 15ohm resistors are 
> used in series with the 600V source to accomplish this.
> 
> Prior to the merging of the telecom and ite standards, modems typically 
> were not evaluated for overvoltage conditions. Even though the installed 
> base was not as large as telephones, and a lot were connected behind pbxs 
> etc., there still appeared to be little to suggest ite connected to teleco 
> lines were having problems. This led the standards development group to 
> look at the construction typically employed by modems at the time and the 
> result was a set of "construction requirements" that most felt would 
> deliver an equivalent level of safety as passing the overvoltage tests. 
> These made their way into the 3rd edition of Ul1950/CSA950. Another 
> significant change is that the UL1950 philosophy of being only an equipment 
> standard eliminated the "simulator fuse" that was intended to represent (if 
> it opened) damage to the network wiring. Only the equipment cord is a 
> concern and this can be addressed by using a min 26AWG size telecom wire.
> 
> If you look at the flowchart included with the standard you can see the 
> left path is "construction" and the right path is "testing" and there are 
> various interconnecting paths allowing some construction and some testing.
> 
> FYI, GR-1089 still requires testing and even requires the unit to be 
> functional after some of the tests.
> 
> 
> 
> Randy Ivans
> Underwriters Laboratories Inc.
> Business Sector Coordinator
> Telecommunications Industry
> email: [email protected]
> -------------
> Original Text
> From: "Duane J. Marcroft" <[email protected]>, on 1/26/99 1:16 PM:
> Hi Treg'rs
> 
> I don't have a copy of UL 1459 and I'm having a problem trying to
> understand why a particular UL test is being performed.  Could I impose on
> someone to explain what UL1459,59.5,b),1) is testing and why?
> 
> The test is being performed on a modem DAA by a piece of automated
> equipment.  As a consequence the person performing the test is unable to
> explain much about the test.
> 
> The TIP & RING circuit being tested consists of a 300V Sidactor,  two 4.7
> ohm resistors and a RJ-11.  The resistors are series with T/P and are there
> to limit current when Sidactor hits break-over point.
> 
> The UL test is applying a longitudinal 600V @ 40A to TIP and RING via the
> RJ-11, with modem on-hook.  There is no current limiting in the test
> equipment except a fuse.
> 
> Heres whats happening:
> 
> When the test is run the Sidactor, one of the resistors fails and current
> limit fuse in test equipment blows.  But, the DAA circuit does pass the
> Part 68 transient test.
> 
> Is this a valid test?  I have designed many modems and never had to pass
> this test before.  Can someone please advise?
> 
> Thank you in advance.
> 
> Duane Marcroft
> Telecom Consultant
> 


PETER S. MERGUERIAN
MANAGING DIRECTOR
PRODUCT TESTING DIVISION
I.T.L. (PRODUCT TESTING) LTD.
HACHAROSHET 26, P.O.B. 211
OR YEHUDA 60251, ISRAEL

TEL: 972-3-5339022
FAX: 972-3-5339019
E-MAIL: [email protected]
Visit our Website: http://www.itl.co.il

Reply via email to