duanne,

This test is being performed to simulate the effect of a power line
falling on a phone line. This is a problem common to Canada and the
United States due to the means in which are power and telephone lines
are carried to the end user. The presumed effect is that when the
circuit in the product does not react safely heat and energy are
likely to be conducted in such a way as to cause fire or smoke that
could lead to a house fire or injury. It was not applied to modems as
they used UL 478 and then later the 1st and second  editions of UL 1950.
When the harmonized version of UL 1950 came out(3rd edition) UL1459
requirements were rolled into it and this effective snared all CPE telco
equipment manufacturers.You will need to calculate the limits of the
circuit and probably change a components value. Sometimes the components
in the circuit need to be reversed. This is a safety issue and not
a FCC Part 68 issue. It is occassionally common for the 2 requirements 
to be incompatible on an initial design test run. You need to determine
if the standard that is being applied is UL1950 3rd edition with
UL 1459 test procedures or UL1459 itself. 

In November and December there was on TREG a long series of discussions
on UL 1950 overvoltage tests which covered a lot of the ground you are
referring too. 


Regards

G. Rae Dulmage, B. Comm.,
President TelApprove Services Corporation
(613) 257 3015
Duane J. Marcroft wrote:
> 
> Hi Treg'rs
> 
> I don't have a copy of UL 1459 and I'm having a problem trying to
> understand why a particular UL test is being performed.  Could I impose on
> someone to explain what UL1459,59.5,b),1) is testing and why?
> 
> The test is being performed on a modem DAA by a piece of automated
> equipment.  As a consequence the person performing the test is unable to
> explain much about the test.
> 
> The TIP & RING circuit being tested consists of a 300V Sidactor,  two 4.7
> ohm resistors and a RJ-11.  The resistors are series with T/P and are there
> to limit current when Sidactor hits break-over point.
> 
> The UL test is applying a longitudinal 600V @ 40A to TIP and RING via the
> RJ-11, with modem on-hook.  There is no current limiting in the test
> equipment except a fuse.
> 
> Heres whats happening:
> 
> When the test is run the Sidactor, one of the resistors fails and current
> limit fuse in test equipment blows.  But, the DAA circuit does pass the
> Part 68 transient test.
> 
> Is this a valid test?  I have designed many modems and never had to pass
> this test before.  Can someone please advise?
> 
> Thank you in advance.
> 
> Duane Marcroft
> Telecom Consultant

Reply via email to