The tests are intended to deal with power system faults on the network. 
These are known to happen and publications like UL1459, CSA225, 
UL1950/CSA950 and Bellcore GR-1089-CORE all have requirements that address 
this. In UL1459 the only option is testing. For your info, the test you 
mention does have limiting....to 40A. I believe that 15ohm resistors are 
used in series with the 600V source to accomplish this.

Prior to the merging of the telecom and ite standards, modems typically 
were not evaluated for overvoltage conditions. Even though the installed 
base was not as large as telephones, and a lot were connected behind pbxs 
etc., there still appeared to be little to suggest ite connected to teleco 
lines were having problems. This led the standards development group to 
look at the construction typically employed by modems at the time and the 
result was a set of "construction requirements" that most felt would 
deliver an equivalent level of safety as passing the overvoltage tests. 
These made their way into the 3rd edition of Ul1950/CSA950. Another 
significant change is that the UL1950 philosophy of being only an equipment 
standard eliminated the "simulator fuse" that was intended to represent (if 
it opened) damage to the network wiring. Only the equipment cord is a 
concern and this can be addressed by using a min 26AWG size telecom wire.

If you look at the flowchart included with the standard you can see the 
left path is "construction" and the right path is "testing" and there are 
various interconnecting paths allowing some construction and some testing.

FYI, GR-1089 still requires testing and even requires the unit to be 
functional after some of the tests.



Randy Ivans
Underwriters Laboratories Inc.
Business Sector Coordinator
Telecommunications Industry
email: [email protected]
-------------
Original Text
From: "Duane J. Marcroft" <[email protected]>, on 1/26/99 1:16 PM:
Hi Treg'rs

I don't have a copy of UL 1459 and I'm having a problem trying to
understand why a particular UL test is being performed.  Could I impose on
someone to explain what UL1459,59.5,b),1) is testing and why?

The test is being performed on a modem DAA by a piece of automated
equipment.  As a consequence the person performing the test is unable to
explain much about the test.

The TIP & RING circuit being tested consists of a 300V Sidactor,  two 4.7
ohm resistors and a RJ-11.  The resistors are series with T/P and are there
to limit current when Sidactor hits break-over point.

The UL test is applying a longitudinal 600V @ 40A to TIP and RING via the
RJ-11, with modem on-hook.  There is no current limiting in the test
equipment except a fuse.

Heres whats happening:

When the test is run the Sidactor, one of the resistors fails and current
limit fuse in test equipment blows.  But, the DAA circuit does pass the
Part 68 transient test.

Is this a valid test?  I have designed many modems and never had to pass
this test before.  Can someone please advise?

Thank you in advance.

Duane Marcroft
Telecom Consultant

Reply via email to