for Greg to have posted that.
The reason is that he gets to impugn my character (by opining about
what he's seen) without providing evidence. Indeed, by its nature,
it's evidence that others CAN'T have seen. He says, "I saw X and you
wouldn't like Marc so well if you saw it too." But the fact is that I
know X, and I know the context, and I dispute his characterization.
Greg may well be the greatest guy in the world, and I don't question
his ethics, but it was a cheap blow for him to do it. I think he
should either apologize or provide all of the relevant messages (which
I don't mind at all). For him to say, "I'm out of this thread", as he
has, only adds to the mistake.
Marc
--- In [email protected], "Douglas J. Boehme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Unless you happen to know Greg or have worked closely with him, you
don't
> have the right to question his ethics. If his e-mail is offensive,
don't
> read it.
>
> _____
>
>
> if you censored his emails, then you have an obligation to keep your
> comments to yourself. Your cooments are every bit as offensive to me as
> anything he MIGHT have said. Where's your ethics?
>
> Bob
>
> Sent from TREO
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
SPONSORED LINKS
| Palm os | Handspring treo | For palm os |
| Palm os database | Palm os software |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "treo" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
