> Unless you happen to know Greg or have worked closely with him, you don't
> have the right to question his ethics.
Well that's exactly what happened to Marc. People who didn't know
anything about him started to question his ethics and attack him
personally.
However, having been a member of the Snapper list and seen for myself
first hand what happened, I have no qualms saying that what Greg is
doing is unethical for the reasons I stated before: you can lob
inflammatory innuendo around like that and hide behind "Well if you
knew what I know" .... Because for all I know, what is unreasonable to
Greg is completely reasonable to me given the circumstances.
> If his e-mail is offensive, don' read it.
That's completely daft. How are we to know which emails are offensive
until we read them? And since when is burying your head an acceptable
response to injustice? Sounds like a Scott McLellan line: "Hey, if
you don't like the lies that are coming from the White House, stop
asking so many questions."
It's smearing someone's character. How utterly ridiculous to think
that a good response to that situation would be to ignore the message
because I find it offensive.
SPONSORED LINKS
| Palm os | Handspring treo | For palm os |
| Palm os database | Palm os software |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "treo" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
