So the question is... Is there any interest in the 680 group that I 
started?  I have a few members and there is some traffic but no where the 
amount I see here.  The intent was that perhaps that version had 
significant changes and would justify its own group... What do you think?

I just read Sam Kamens viewpoint on it.  It would make me believe there 
would be a lack of interest in a 680 only group...

Roger
---
Roger Prokic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *NEW*
Moderator of Palm_Treo_680 Yahoo group
Baltimore, Maryland USA

-=[ This email was sent from a Palm Treo 680 palm computer using 
SnapperMail Enterprise Edition v2.3.7.01 ]=-

 _
( ) The ASCII ribbon campaign                  
 X     against HTML e-mail                     
/ \ 


...... Original Message .......
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:37:37 -0400 Scandals & Animals 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There used to be a 600-only group, but it vanished overnight. I restarted
>it, invited the most active members, and they joined. But it never really
>got off the ground and I pulled the plug a few weeks later. I joined a
>700P group, because I'm thinking of upgrading, but there's no traffic on 
it.
>
>--------------------
>"In my lifetime, we've gone from Eisenhower to George W. Bush, from John
>Kennedy to Albert Gore. Now if that is evolution, I believe that in about
>12 years, we're gonna be voting for plants."
>
>--Comedian Lewis Black
>
>...... Original Message .......
>On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:08:54 -0500 Roger Prokic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I thought the group is called Treo thus all treos? That's why I had
>>started a Treo 680 group because I was afraid that this group would be
>>talking all Treos even Windoze w versions...
>>---
>>Roger Prokic
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] *NEW*
>>Moderator of Palm_Treo_680 Yahoo group
>>Baltimore, Maryland USA
>>
>>-=[ This email was sent from a Palm Treo 680 palm computer using
>>SnapperMail Enterprise Edition v2.3.7.01 ]=-
>>
>>_
>>( ) The ASCII ribbon campaign
>>X against HTML e-mail
>>/ \
>>
>>...... Original Message .......
>>On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:05:04 -0400 Bill Gamble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>The w's not really talked about in this group.
>>>______
>>>Bill
>>>O-Qwa Tangin Wann
>>>
>>>...... Original Message .......
>>>On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:25:16 -0400 Roger Prokic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>Don't forget the p or w also....
>>>>---
>>>>Roger Prokic
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>...... Original Message .......
>>>>On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:37:08 -0400 Scandals & Animals
>>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>How about we start including in the subject line, right at the 
beginning,
>>>>>the model of Treo that the post is about? Question about a 680? The
>>>>>proper subject line would be "680: <remainder of subject>." Same goes 
for
>>>>>the 650, 700, etc. A general question could be preceeded by "general" 
or
>>>>>"all."
>>>>>
>>>>>Howboutit?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to