Putting it that way: Centro, please. And this would only be after my 680 decided to stop working. I do not upgrade just for the looks.
But it doesn't have GSM so ... (you'd be surprised how much coffee I already had today, it's 15h35 where I live ;-) Greetz, Nico. On 09 Nov 2007 09:11:00 -0500, Roger Prokic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You're missing my point. I'm asking you yo compare the hardware. You > have a Treo 680. Would you rather the 680 or it's replacement have the > hardware of the Centro or the 500v. > > Seems a lot if you have not had your coffee this morning. > > roger > --- > Roger Prokic > > -=[ This email was sent from a Palm™ Treo 680 smartphone using > ChatterEmail v3.0.9]=- > -----Original Message----- > From: Nico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Friday, Nov 9, 2007 9:04 am > Subject: Re: [Treo] Centro & Treo 500v comparison > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [email protected] > > 1- I already have 680 > 2- Centro is CDMA, not GSM > 3- 500v is WM6 Standard, not PalmOS > > As much as you want to steer this to a HW only discussion, to me OS WILL > be > a decisive factor for any purchase in this area. > > Greetz, > Nico. > > On 09 Nov 2007 08:56:00 -0500, Roger Prokic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There's another reason... Thin is in. > > > > So why not buy a 680 replacement Treo with the 500v hardware specs. > > --- > > Roger Prokic > > > > -=[ This email was sent from a Palm™ Treo 680 smartphone using > > ChatterEmail v3.0.9]=- > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Friday, Nov 9, 2007 8:37 am > > Subject: Re: [Treo] Centro & Treo 500v comparison > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [email protected] > > > > > > > > Granted, but 500v is a LOT THINNER then let's say a 680. It is even > > thinner > > then Centro when looking at the spec sheet. > > > > But I would never trade my 680 for a 500v (limited experience after > only > > 2 > > days of usage) > > > > Greetz, > > Nico. > > > > On Nov 9, 2007 1:49 PM, Alli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The whole idea was to move to a smaller device. If I wanted wider I > > > could just stay with the 700p. The screen resolution is > > > smaller...doesn't matter how wide it is physically. I don't think > 50mAh > > > will make that much difference to the battery. > > > > > > Even as a power user with a TON of apps, I have adequate RAM space. > > > > > > The only benefit I see might be the usb connector. > > > > > > > > > Roger Prokic wrote: > > > > Did you see the hardware is better than on the Treo? > > > > > > > > It's a little wider... so screen is a bit bigger. > > > > > > > > Larger battery size > > > > > > > > Larger ROM (larger user space *aka RAM*) > > > > > > > > Uses a mini-USB connector (just about all new devices are coming out > > > > with this now) > > > > > > > > Do I need to continue? > > > > > > > > Roger > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/treo/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/treo/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
