I dearly wish I had had the same experience as you with the 680. I wasted a great deal of time over a 30-days period on 2 separate units with several clean, cold, back-to-factory-specs reboots, reinstalling apps. slowly, patiently one at a time just the way you've described before. I suffered through literally hours of tech. support calls including their blame-the-other guy attitude about Bluetooth unreliability and assertions that the 680 would never work reliably without a 3G SIM card (which T-Mobile can't supply because they don't have a 3G system yet). -- Larry Hess, CPA | Albuquerque, NM
On 12/3/07, Jeffrey Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 07:46:02 -0700 you said: > > > By returning it I meant permanently--for a refund. I found the 680 > > impossibly buggy. A 650 with a broken earpiece is more pleasant to use. > > The Treo 680 is the best cellphone I've had since my last StarTac. I've > had mine for about a year now, and before that I had a 650. My only > real complaint about it is the short battery life. > > I would suspect that whatever "buggy" problems you had with it were > caused by either improperly upgrading from another Palm device, or > buggy software. > > The 650, now there was a buggy device. It took two hardware swaps and > three OS updates to get it working right. > > -- > Jeffrey Kaplan www.gordol.org > The from userid is killfiled Send personal mail to gordol > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
