Thank you for your kind note on Christmas.

Merry Christmas to you and Happy New Year

Roger
---
Roger Prokic
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry 8820 by AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: "john.messeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:59:57 
To:[email protected]
Subject: Re: [Treo] Treo 680 vs 650?


I wasn't really trying to say don't mention the BB on the Treo forum -- 
just commenting on it being the answer to the 680 question -- with a 
little tongue in cheek, which wasn't obvious because I clomped down 
fairly firmly on the meaty part with my molars.
Matter of fact, maybe Roger-type BB notes will help the Treo get better. 
(Written from a true believer in the merits of competition in which the 
better product pushes its way to the top of the market.)
So, that being my feeble attempt at apologizing for what, when I reread 
it, was a little less kind than I intended -- allow me to wish a
Merry Christmas to the list, and Happy New Year, too.

On 12/24/2007 at 1226 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


> Roger, I'll remember to look for your posts here and, hopefully, on
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] when I get my BB.
>
> -- Larry Hess, CPA | Albuquerque, NM On 12/23/07, Roger Prokic 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Sorry guys.  I'm a die hard palm fanatic since palm was born, and now I
>> > have found the Blackberry to aid the palm quirks I've had to deal with for
>> > quite some time.
>> >
>> > I am only sharing my experience.
>> >
>> > Roger
>> > ---
>> > Roger Prokic
>> > Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry 8820 by AT&T
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: "john.messeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >
>> > Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 21:06:25
>> > To:[email protected]
>> > Subject: Re: [Treo] Treo 680 vs 650?
>> >
>> >
>> > My 680 has been vastly superior to my 650 in at least two ways:
>> >     = 680 can consistently make calls, with fewer bars, than the 650. I
>> > don't know the actual technical reason, but it seems to lock weaker
>> > signals much better than the 650.
>> >     = it seems more stable than the 650, even before I installed the
>> > custom ROM - which made it measurably faster.
>> >
>> > (I've gotta say this: It does seem a little tacky on a Treo forum to
>> > answer a Treo question with a promo for Blackberry.)
>> >
>> >
>> > On 12/22/2007 at 1725 -0500
>> > "Roger Prokic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>>     
>>> > > The 680 does have good reception, but I found I always had a few
>>>       
>> > dropouts going to work.  With my Blackberry I don't have any dropouts now.
>>     
>>> > >
>>> > > Roger
>>> > > ---
>>> > > Roger Prokic
>>> > > Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry 8820 by AT&T
>>> > >
>>> > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > > From: Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> > >
>>> > > Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:09:45
>>> > > To:[email protected]
>>> > > Subject: [Treo] Treo 680 vs 650?
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > I love the Palm system but had to get rid of my Treo 650 because of
>>> > >  poor reception. I understand the 680 is supposed to have significantly
>>> > >  better reception. Is this the case? Any other differences worth
>>> > >  mentioning?
>>> > >
>>> > >  Agunat
>>>       

-- 

/“Thirty-five million deaths leave an empty place at only one family 
table.” /
(News commentator Eric Severied in a radio essay on the 25th anniversary 
of the start of World War Two. 8/31/64)


 
Yahoo! Groups Links





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/treo/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/treo/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to