I really dislike WM - a few people have them where I work (BB is the
standard) and they are a pain in the neck, even though the stability may
have improved.  What hasn't improved enough - though it has gotten somewhat
better - is memory leaks.   The bottom line for me is whether the device
makes my life easier, and WinMob and BB devices don't do that.  Palm is
getting to that point pretty quickly, unfortunately, but it still works
better for me.  I really want to buy a new device but nothing I've seen so
far offers anything which makes it worthwhile for me.  If Palm goes
completely away, I fear that portable devices will stagnate or even get
worse, since developers won't see any reason to invest in new designs or
technology - it's easier to convince users to deal with design limitations
rather than provide more choices.

 

Mike Lax

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Levi
Wallach
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 3:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Treo] Re: Sign of the times?

 

Not at this point. WM 5 and 6 are pretty mature. They are still faulted for
their not particularly intuitive UI, although I've gotten used to it. Just a
matter of remapping your brain a bit! ;-) But as far as stability, I think
my Treo 700w has reset itself maybe twice since I bought it back last
September. Compare that to my 700P which seemed to reset itself at least
once or twice a week, and then once or twice (or more) per day after the
firmware update! :-o

________________________________________
From: [email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:m.nuttall%40ukonline.co.uk>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:m.nuttall%40ukonline.co.uk> ]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 3:46 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:treo%40yahoogroups.com> 
Subject: Re: [Treo] Re: Sign of the times?

Arent win mob pda/smartphones famous for their instability?

Theres symbian based phones but they dont have the depth of software that
the palm does.

Martin N 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to