I found it - it was in Wired

http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/07/st_thompson_deadphone/

On 8/16/10, George Kontos <[email protected]> wrote:
> I also read that article just the other day.  I tried looking for it online,
> but can't find it.  I think it was in either Wired or Time magazine.  Do you
> recall?
>
> George
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> ldouglas
> Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 9:04 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Treo] Re: My Dad & His MemoPad Dilemma (webOS)
>
> I read an interesting article about the death of the phone call that
> changed my viewpoint a bit on this subject. The author was basically
> saying that in the days before text messaging and even answering
> machines, a phone call was nothing more than an interruption. The
> caller didn't know the schedule of the person he called, whether it
> was convenient or not, etc. Nowadays we can schedule those synchronous
> phone calls using asynchronous email, text messages, or IM so that the
> actual phone call can be as productive as possible.
>
> Of course, this doesn't make up for the fact that people are using one
> to replace the other, but a little balance can help rather than hurt.
>
> On 8/16/10, Chuck B. <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Tony Cooke
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And, (said he starting the sentence wrongly!) I am at great pains to
>>> always spell and punctuate my SMS texts correctly when texting my
>>> grandkids.
>>>
>>
>>  Which brings me to one of MY pet peeves these days.  Why doesn't anyone
>> CALL any more????  How much time could we save if we stopped texting and
>> started calling!  Not to mention the potential for a return to
>> actual "Customer Service" from vendors!
>>  (Sorry to stick my two cents in on you "old-timers" here on the board,
> but
>> texting and email as the foundation of modern human interaction has become
> a
>> real bug up my b*tt the past year or so . . .  and I found that I needed
> to
>> vent too.)
>>
>> Chuck B.
>>

Reply via email to