Bhala , how you doing shamaz , i heard u r not in Zim is that true ?
On 07/04/2009, Khumalo Jabulani <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Guys
>
>
>
> The law was placed to control people who control themselves right!
>
> Imagine if everyone at their bespoke convictions set up what they deemed
> was right to protect themselves what it would be like.
>
> I am not in detail about the case but I think where people reside you don’t
> set up voltage enough to kill someone, it should be enough to fend of
> someone but not to kill.
>
> It’s a thin line that looks rational at first but can evolve into something
> else if not controlled. I don’t think what he put up was endorsed by the
> laws that brackets him and with what the verse says I rightfully agree with
> Chief roots
>
> -1 and +1 are extremes but note that a zero is in between
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *paida motsi
> *Sent:* 07 April 2009 12:26
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Question
>
>
>
> i totaly agree w u Chief Ru ,i just dnt understand why they are trying the
> man in court ,
>
> On 07/04/2009, *Rutendo Chabururuka* <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hie there Paida!!
>
>
>
> Well it's an interesing debate you have started!! Well what I can say is
> that whilst a thief should justifiably face the full wrath of the law for
> their action, there is no condemnation for protecting your property from
> intrusion. However, the fact that the owner of the tree is being tried is
> contestable, in my opinion because it's like I have a barbed wire ober my
> property and yu try to skip over it and you rip yourself in the process.
> Surely I cannot be held liable given my protection.
>
>
>
> As for the Provers scripture that you quoted, my understanding is that to
> not despise a thief does not mean that there is no need to arrest. The thief
> should be apprehended and the law must take its course but yours is to
> forgive the thief given the motive. I must admit that it's quite difficult
> to balance and have peace of mind but we have GRACE!!!
>
>
>
> Those are just my views dunno what the others think..........
>
>
>
> On 4/7/09, *paida motsi* <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> okay guys i got a serious question to ask , i read in the paper that
> there are these two pple who were electrocuted , whilst trying to steal
> Avocados from an avocado tree .Okay the owner of the tree had connected a
> live wire to the tree bcz of the many cases of theft , so one night these
> two pple decided to steal some avos and they were quite unfortunate and they
> were electrocuted .so now the owner of the tree is in court being charged
> for connecting the live wire , my question is ,
>
>
>
> *was it wrong for him to do wat he did , and shd he be charged ?i i was
> thinking wat he did was ok bcz pple were trspasing and wat cd stop them from
> stealing other things if they had the nerve to climb his fence and steal
> avos , ?????thn now i read from Proverbs 6 vs 30 in ydays bible reading
> that " Pple do not despise a thief ,if he steals to satisfy himself whn he
> is starving ,yet whn he is found ,he must restore sevenhold,he may give up
> all the substance of his house " *
>
>
>
> so my question still stands , am a bit confused now , was the man wrong in
> protecting his household ??????
>
> --
> 'Unless you change what you do, you will always have what you've got.'
> - Jim Rohn
>
> </div
>
>
> >
>
--
'Unless you change what you do, you will always have what you've got.'
- Jim Rohn
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"tribewithavibe" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tribewithavibe?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
