If I might ask, why the -1 for TWC?
On 10/6/05, Jason Tower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > vonage +1 > twc -1 > > works like a champ for me, i'm behind a wrt54gs but have not set up qos, > doesn't seem to matter much. plus it's cheaper and has more features. > easy choice imho. > > Matt Pusateri wrote: > > Triluggers, > > > > I trying to decide on Vonage versus Time Warner Cable's phone service. > > I have had mixed reviews on both. Anyone care to share the > > experiences. From a price perspective Vonage seems more desirable, > > but I don't want to end up in one of those - You get what you pay for > > scenarios. > > > > Also those that are successful in having good quality voip service do > > you have the voip ATA box ahead of you local network or behind. If > > behind are you doing and QOS. My setup will most likely involve a > > WRTG54. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Matt P. > > > -- > TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug > TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ > TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ > -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
