What's the problem, exactly? As far as I can tell, the system isn't corrupt; they aren't accepting payments for intrusive ads. The only possible objection that I can think of is that the developer gets money from the feature. Considering that the whole point of the feature in the first place is to help someone else (someone running a website) get money, I don't think this is nonsensical in any way, and the only effect on users would be that sites that don't pay simply have their "acceptable" ads blocked, which is what would happen without the feature anyway.

Reply via email to