"Facebook's content can be rendered with a free software Web browser (such as
Trisquel's Abrowser). The mobile version of Facebook does not make this
browser run proprietary Javascript. So, unless you prove the contrary,
"Facebook can be used with 100% free software"."
I'm not trying to prove contrary. That is my own statement. I'm just confused
because you seem to say facebook isn't SaaSS while fbit (originally) says it
is.
"Facebook's main use is to distribute content and to communicate with other
users. It is not doing one's own computing. It is not SaaSS."
I agree with this. Fbit does not.
"Facebook's problem is that it infringes its users' privacies. It has even
become a threat to humanity that is as huge as its database (that is now
known to be shared with the NSA). I do not like Facebook. At all. But that is
not a reason to lie about it and pretend that it cannot be used with free
software or that it is SaaSS. That is not intellectually honest. We are to
convince people not to use Facebook for the real problems it raises."
I am not the one making those claims, that is fbit. I am the one who said
"Facebook can be used with 100% free software." I was simply showing that in
the case some does consider facebook as SaaSS (again, I do not believe this),
it would also apply to many other services, including Trisquel forums.
