Re: [Trisquel-users] Could systemd be an inconvenient on portability?

[danigaritarojas]

> The question people should ask, is not is systemd good or bad, but why are  
Pottering and crew making it a "requirement" or hard dependency for so many  
programs, and the list keeps growing!

Why should that be the second important question after the freedom question?  
If systemd is free software, well designed, documented, etc then it isn't a  
bad thing. Is it? So I think before supposing that systemd is bad because Red  
Hat is lobbying to impose it, we should simply find whether systemd is "good  
or bad".