I also wonder if it would be wise to go to The Free Software Foundation or
RMS and ask them to make a public comment to possibly get the word out. This
seems timely since so many articles by the tech "press" used the FSF
Partnership with Crowd Supply as an oppertunity to plug the Purism Librem
that had nothing to do with the announcement. There are a multitude of
stories floating around just like this one:
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/07/founder-of-gnu-bestows-blessing-upon-open-source-crowdfunding-site/
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is this Librem13 fully free... J.B. Nicholson-Owens
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is this Librem13 fully free... t8mf4nu6lizp
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is this Librem13 fully free this... gromobir
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is this Librem13 fully free this... chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is this Librem13 fully free this... chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is this Librem13 fully free this... dhood
- [Trisquel-users] Ars Technica wrongly affiliates... J.B. Nicholson-Owens
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is this Librem13 fully free... greatgnu
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is this Librem13 fully free... J.B. Nicholson-Owens
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is this Librem13 fully ... legimet . calc
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is this Librem13 fully ... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is this Librem13 fu... marioxcc . MT
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is this Librem13 fully free this... todd
