There are many Firefox forks, what would be impossible without freedom 3. If none fixes what you call "critical issues", it is because their communities do not see those as critical issues. Thanks to freedom 3, another fork can arise to fix the "critical issues". You can push in that direction or, like you do (and it is indeed better to not scatter the development effort), try to convince the developers of Firefox (or of one of the derivatives) that the issues you point are indeed critical and ought to be addressed, despite the associated loss in functionalities.
Where is the community who has the 'freedoms' to modify things when such
critical issue is found?
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Web ... studio
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Web ... Mason Hock
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Web ... studio
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Web ... Mason Hock
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Web ... Mason Hock
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Web ... studio
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Web ... Mason Hock
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Web ... studio
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Web ... Adonay Felipe Nogueira
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Web ... studio
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Web... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Web ... studio
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Web... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Web ... studio
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Web ... greatgnu
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Web ... studio
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Web Browser ar018
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Web Browser fil . bergamo
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Web Browser studio
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Web Browser Mason Hock
