> There is sense: the telemetry component of Firefox sends anonimized data
that help Firefox's development, safe search warns about phishing and
malware, etc.
> "Different views than yours" is what you call "nonsense".
No. It is not "my view" vs another. It is contradiction of facts with
promises.
Mozilla admits that Firefox transmits a full fingerprint of the system, the
way the program is being used and couple all that with your IP address. There
is nothing "anonimized" about that, it contradicts the very definition of
privacy and putting it in a "privacy" policy is complete nonsense.
https://trisquel.info/en/forum/web-browser?page=4#comment-127197
> I defend the free software definition
Please do it in a separate dedicated thread as suggested by Mason, so this
one doesn't get repeatedly diluted with all that.
> You blame the free software definition for not providing you the software
you want.
No. I blame FSF for misleading the reader (paragraph 3):
https://trisquel.info/en/forum/web-browser?page=4#comment-127279
