> This thread will go off the rails again if we discuss anything other than web browsers here.

Agreed. Next time anyone mentions anything about "but this is not free" I won't answer, so that I don't get accused of "tactics". Then you can tell the other person to stay on topic. :)

> Can you remind me of whether Palemoon's default about:config prevented background connections, or if you had to additionally configure it yourself?

To keep the reply as short as possible:

https://trisquel.info/en/forum/web-browser?page=2#comment-126740

> Either way, it sounds like this Firefox derivative is the easiest you've found for which to disable automatic connections. While I am unwilling to use Palemoon for my computing because it is proprietary (though I respect your right to decide differently) I will download it to compare its about:config to that of Firefox after following the broken documentation page. Focusing on the differences will narrow down the number of value changes to try in order to disable all automatic connections.

I am not going to use Palemoon. It seems somewhat crippled. Additionally I don't like the reply I received by their developers when I reported the privacy issues for Basilisk.

I prefer to strengthen IceCat and Tor. My strengthened user.js should be able to give the zero packet privacy in all FF forks. But still I am willing to improve it further if possible. Perhaps you can test it with Palemoon.

Reply via email to