> would not. I would probably use some 'degoogled' (if that's even possible)
chromium.
I already explained what I meant by that
(https://trisquel.info/en/forum/family-privacy-again#comment-127677). But
yes, I wouldn't have expected less from you.
> Why would you say so?
Heyjoe is dogmatic* in his belief that a program can be free software and
simultaneously disrespect user privacy, as can be read in the very long "Web
Browsers" thread. Several people have patiently explained to him why this is
not the case. In case you don't have all weekend to read, I will provide you
the first shortcut: https://trisquel.info/en/forum/web-browser#comment-126105
Moglen has been wrong about other predictions and is not infallible. Heyjoe
is disrespectful of him, as he was of Magic Banana and others (in my opinion
of course. You need not agree).
* In the pejorative sense, dogma refers to enforced decisions, such as those
of aggressive political interests or authorities.[4][5] More generally it is
applied to some strong belief that the ones adhering to it are not willing to
rationally discuss.
From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogmatic
