************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************ I read 'objectives' as goals, rather than as 'op's'.
My mistake :) JM On 09/11/2010 10:24, Slim wrote: > Cchs are pretty to run solo as is op pro by dup > > I'll take two trees that are next to each other and find differences > and similarities between them and experience benifits > > It's much like comparing a past scene to the present but both are in > the present. > > It goes flat like all cchs and op pro by dup process' do each session > Then you run your timebreaking drills on levels 2 through 5 > > > There is a benifit from just contacting a past scene or so called > incident just by view > > On Nov 9, 2010, at 1:58 AM, Jon Murray <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ************* >> The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] >> ************ >> Isn't it dangerous to run goals briefing course style? >> >> According to Stephens, the opposers will always be wrong as they aren't >> in the bank and have to be constructed into packages by the analytical >> mind (hence the goals packages of TROM). >> >> According to TROM you should never ask what opposes a goal or run any >> non life goals packages. >> >> Could the their auditing gains have come from running incidents rather >> than objectives? >> >> Apologies if I have misunderstood the post. >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Jon >> >> On 09/11/2010 06:24, Ant Phillips wrote: >>> ************* >>> The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] >>> ************ >>> Dear TROMmers, >>> >>> Yes there is a whole Scientology world outside of TROM. What >>> "orthodox" TROMmers might call the "alternative" world. >>> I knew a married couple who co-audited Scientology objectives on each >>> other yearly, with good results. (They were both Briefing Course >>> graduates, and "knew their onions") >>> >>> In the Scientology world, I was "forced" to take a "Dug Rundown" at >>> one point before they would allow me to go further. The only part of >>> it which gave me nice results was the objectives! I have also got >>> good results recently running incidents, Scientology style (parts of >>> R3X) on a friend recently - amazing results. >>> >>> There is a world outside of TROM. (valuable to those who have >>> overcome their ARC breaks with Scn and their false data on Scn) >>> >>> All best wishes, >>> >>> Ant >>> >>> PS R.C. means Roman Catholic to me. >>> >>> >>> At 01:06 09-11-2010, Colleen Peltomaa wrote: >>>> I have had 3 years now of engram running using r3x, and I priorly >>>> received some CCHs in the Atlanta Church Org, to an EP, and I felt >>>> much more in present time as a result. >>>> >>>> It would never have occurred to me that I would need to re-do the >>>> CCH's. However, upon R.C.'s insistence, he began delivering them to >>>> me anew. Lo and behold they "bit" like they did not the first time >>>> years ago. I would not have discovered for myself my need for them >>>> and might have a reason for why I am not feeling very successful >>>> running TROM consistently. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Trom mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Trom mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom _______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
