*************
The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
************
I love talking about polarity. However what I see is that applying ethics is a 
matter of doing right or doing wrong. And any game is polarized, thus to have 
ethics in is to be good, and that makes it a game. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 8, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Paul Tipon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> *************
> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
> ************
> Hi Cory,
> 
> Freedom from games is to not have the intention that there will be a win or a 
> loss or both, a winner and a looser.  Some will always come to a conclusion 
> of a win or a loss or both but you don't have to.  Some cannot see beyond 
> having winners and loosers.  One should be content that things can happen and 
> happen for the better.  In this way, Ethics can be applied without one having 
> to enter into games.  The physical universe is a force universe but it is not 
> a necessity that it also be a two pole and have polarizing effects.  There 
> can be best and almost as good as best.  We don't have to have the best and 
> the worst.
> 
> It's all subjective even when it is objective and purely physical.  What can 
> you see?
> 
> Keep on TROMmoing, Paul
> 
>> On Feb 8, 2014, at 2:26 AM, Cory Keeler wrote:
>> 
>> Just curious you wrote:
>> 
>>> It is up to each individual to be free of games and have their Ethics in to 
>>> avoid catching themselves up with out-Ethics and having motivators.
>> 
>> Is not having ethics in and being free of games impossible? Ethics involves 
>> games right?
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
> _______________________________________________
> Trom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom

Reply via email to