*************
The following message is relayed to you by [email protected]
************
Hi Cory,
Yes, your conclusion is correct but there are still three parts. If
you are not into having a winner or a looser in an encounter with
another or others, then there is no game by you. The other or others
may not see it that way and are looking for a winner or a looser so
it is a game for them. From an exterior view of an encounter, the
encounter may be a game or not a game to all of those doing
encountering. No conclusions can be taken until more actions have
been taken and those actions are available to view.
The one who has 'Freedom from Overwhelm' and 'Freedom from Games' can
be thought of as a stranger in a strange land and be very alone.
This is why Dennis says that you will be alone as you progress
through TROM and the only way to avoid this is to also take someone
with you. I forget if he makes that statement after Level 3 or 4.
One may have his Ethics in and may not have a game within an
encounter but the encounter is still the playing of a game and one or
more of the encounterors may wind up exiting the encounter as neutral
for they did not play the game to a win or a loose. They just
participated and their underlying intention was for everyone to do
well and not necessarily loose but not have to win. For those
sticklers that have to have polarities, no matter what, it can be
said that the encounter was a win-win situation. And again it can be
said for a particular encounter as this, win-win, there is and was no
game.
Keep on TROMmoing, Paul
On Feb 8, 2014, at 6:18 PM, Cory Keeler wrote:
I love talking about polarity. However what I see is that applying
ethics is a matter of doing right or doing wrong. And any game is
polarized, thus to have ethics in is to be good, and that makes it
a game.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 8, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Paul Tipon <[email protected]>
wrote:
*************
The following message is relayed to you by [email protected]
************
Hi Cory,
Freedom from games is to not have the intention that there will be
a win or a loss or both, a winner and a looser. Some will always
come to a conclusion of a win or a loss or both but you don't have
to. Some cannot see beyond having winners and loosers. One
should be content that things can happen and happen for the
better. In this way, Ethics can be applied without one having to
enter into games. The physical universe is a force universe but
it is not a necessity that it also be a two pole and have
polarizing effects. There can be best and almost as good as
best. We don't have to have the best and the worst.
It's all subjective even when it is objective and purely
physical. What can you see?
Keep on TROMmoing, Paul
On Feb 8, 2014, at 2:26 AM, Cory Keeler wrote:
Just curious you wrote:
It is up to each individual to be free of games and have their
Ethics in to avoid catching themselves up with out-Ethics and
having motivators.
Is not having ethics in and being free of games impossible?
Ethics involves games right?
Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
