************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
Hi Paul
Thank you. Next stop is no games. Keep on TROMing Pete Sent from my iPad > On Feb 9, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Paul Tipon <[email protected]> wrote: > > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] > ************ > Hi Pete, > > You are becoming the master of games, a step very far above that of a master > game player. Indeed a master of the games themselves. > > Keep on TROMmoing, Paul > > >> On Feb 9, 2014, at 3:24 AM, Pete Mclaughlin wrote: >> >> Hi Paul >> I am finding that even though I am at level 3 and still have some compulsive >> games going on I can encounter an other who wants to come at me with an >> opposition postulate to mine. But if I recognize this as a game I don't want >> to play I can change my postulate to a complementary postulate. When I do >> this the other fails to hold their opposition postulate and wanders away. >> Because of my understanding of games I can dissolve games conditions or >> changes the others interest in playing a game. >> >> Fun stuff. >> Pete >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On Feb 8, 2014, at 9:44 PM, Paul Tipon <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> ************* >>> The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] >>> ************ >>> Hi Cory, >>> >>> Yes, your conclusion is correct but there are still three parts. If you >>> are not into having a winner or a looser in an encounter with another or >>> others, then there is no game by you. The other or others may not see it >>> that way and are looking for a winner or a looser so it is a game for them. >>> From an exterior view of an encounter, the encounter may be a game or not >>> a game to all of those doing encountering. No conclusions can be taken >>> until more actions have been taken and those actions are available to view. >>> >>> The one who has 'Freedom from Overwhelm' and 'Freedom from Games' can be >>> thought of as a stranger in a strange land and be very alone. This is why >>> Dennis says that you will be alone as you progress through TROM and the >>> only way to avoid this is to also take someone with you. I forget if he >>> makes that statement after Level 3 or 4. >>> >>> One may have his Ethics in and may not have a game within an encounter but >>> the encounter is still the playing of a game and one or more of the >>> encounterors may wind up exiting the encounter as neutral for they did not >>> play the game to a win or a loose. They just participated and their >>> underlying intention was for everyone to do well and not necessarily loose >>> but not have to win. For those sticklers that have to have polarities, no >>> matter what, it can be said that the encounter was a win-win situation. >>> And again it can be said for a particular encounter as this, win-win, there >>> is and was no game. >>> >>> Keep on TROMmoing, Paul >>> >>>> On Feb 8, 2014, at 6:18 PM, Cory Keeler wrote: >>>> >>>> I love talking about polarity. However what I see is that applying ethics >>>> is a matter of doing right or doing wrong. And any game is polarized, thus >>>> to have ethics in is to be good, and that makes it a game. >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>>> On Feb 8, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Paul Tipon <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ************* >>>>> The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] >>>>> ************ >>>>> Hi Cory, >>>>> >>>>> Freedom from games is to not have the intention that there will be a win >>>>> or a loss or both, a winner and a looser. Some will always come to a >>>>> conclusion of a win or a loss or both but you don't have to. Some cannot >>>>> see beyond having winners and loosers. One should be content that things >>>>> can happen and happen for the better. In this way, Ethics can be applied >>>>> without one having to enter into games. The physical universe is a force >>>>> universe but it is not a necessity that it also be a two pole and have >>>>> polarizing effects. There can be best and almost as good as best. We >>>>> don't have to have the best and the worst. >>>>> >>>>> It's all subjective even when it is objective and purely physical. What >>>>> can you see? >>>>> >>>>> Keep on TROMmoing, Paul >>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 8, 2014, at 2:26 AM, Cory Keeler wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Just curious you wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> It is up to each individual to be free of games and have their Ethics >>>>>>> in to avoid catching themselves up with out-Ethics and having >>>>>>> motivators. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is not having ethics in and being free of games impossible? Ethics >>>>>> involves games right? >>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Trom mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Trom mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Trom mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom >> _______________________________________________ >> Trom mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom > > _______________________________________________ > Trom mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
