*************
The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
************
Hi Paul
I am finding that even though I am at level 3 and still have some compulsive 
games going on I can encounter an other who wants to come at me with an 
opposition postulate to mine. But if I recognize this as a game I don't want to 
play I can change my postulate to a complementary postulate. When I do this the 
other fails to hold their opposition postulate and wanders away.
Because of my understanding of games I can dissolve games conditions or changes 
the others interest in playing a game.

Fun stuff.
Pete

Sent from my iPad

> On Feb 8, 2014, at 9:44 PM, Paul Tipon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> *************
> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
> ************
> Hi Cory,
> 
> Yes, your conclusion is correct but there are still three parts.  If you are 
> not into having a winner or a looser in an encounter with another or others, 
> then there is no game by you.  The other or others may not see it that way 
> and are looking for a winner or a looser so it is a game for them.  From an 
> exterior view of an encounter, the encounter may be a game or not a game to 
> all of those doing encountering.  No conclusions can be taken until more 
> actions have been taken and those actions are available to view.
> 
> The one who has 'Freedom from Overwhelm' and 'Freedom from Games' can be 
> thought of as a stranger in a strange land and be very alone.  This is why 
> Dennis says that you will be alone as you progress through TROM and the only 
> way to avoid this is to also take someone with you.  I forget if he makes 
> that statement after Level 3 or 4.  
> 
> One may have his Ethics in and may not have a game within an encounter but 
> the encounter is still the playing of a game and one or more of the 
> encounterors may wind up exiting the encounter as neutral for they did not 
> play the game to a win or a loose.  They just participated and their 
> underlying intention was for everyone to do well and not necessarily loose 
> but not have to win.  For those sticklers that have to have polarities, no 
> matter what, it can be said that the encounter was a win-win situation.  And 
> again it can be said for a particular encounter as this, win-win, there is 
> and was no game.
> 
> Keep on TROMmoing, Paul
> 
>> On Feb 8, 2014, at 6:18 PM, Cory Keeler wrote:
>> 
>> I love talking about polarity. However what I see is that applying ethics is 
>> a matter of doing right or doing wrong. And any game is polarized, thus to 
>> have ethics in is to be good, and that makes it a game. 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Feb 8, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Paul Tipon <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> *************
>>> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
>>> ************
>>> Hi Cory,
>>> 
>>> Freedom from games is to not have the intention that there will be a win or 
>>> a loss or both, a winner and a looser.  Some will always come to a 
>>> conclusion of a win or a loss or both but you don't have to.  Some cannot 
>>> see beyond having winners and loosers.  One should be content that things 
>>> can happen and happen for the better.  In this way, Ethics can be applied 
>>> without one having to enter into games.  The physical universe is a force 
>>> universe but it is not a necessity that it also be a two pole and have 
>>> polarizing effects.  There can be best and almost as good as best.  We 
>>> don't have to have the best and the worst.
>>> 
>>> It's all subjective even when it is objective and purely physical.  What 
>>> can you see?
>>> 
>>> Keep on TROMmoing, Paul
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 8, 2014, at 2:26 AM, Cory Keeler wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Just curious you wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> It is up to each individual to be free of games and have their Ethics in 
>>>>> to avoid catching themselves up with out-Ethics and having motivators.
>>>> 
>>>> Is not having ethics in and being free of games impossible? Ethics 
>>>> involves games right?
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Trom mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>> _______________________________________________
>> Trom mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Trom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom

Reply via email to