[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Glenn - What you quote is an opinion,
DAVEH:  Of Bible scholars, rather than a biased opinion of somebody trying to spin the Bible to suit their own desires.
not scripture.    I could quote the opposite,
DAVEH:  Until you do, I can only conclude that Bible scholars disagree with you.
but these publications are not Scripture.  Christians do differ on this, but you are dead wrong on my changing it.  I believe it, plus nothing, minus nothing.
DAVEH:  So how do you distinguish between symbolism and reality in the Bible?  Why think this account is real when Bible scholars disagree?  Furthermore......I think there is scriptural evidence to suggest you are wrong.
Christianity teaches that it was a parable, and not an actual event.  So Glenn, I guess your previous comment "Why do Mormons insist on changing what has been written many years ago in their doctrines?" might more aptly apply to you, eh!  <VBG>


--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 

Reply via email to