>From: Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>DAVEH: REALLY!?!?!?!?!? .
>
> Brother Glenn, you made the statement..........
>
>"If it CAN be taken literal it MUST be taken literal."
>
> And......I'd be happy if other TTers would share their thoughts with
>me on this matter too.
>
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> > Glenn - I need some help here. I understood that the way I
> >> > interpret the Bible is generally accepted among evangelical
> >> > Christians.
> >>
> >>
> >> DAVEH: If that is truly the case, then would you not think that our
> >> Father in Heaven is a man? For does not the Bible testify that
> >> Jesus is the "Son of man"? Yet many times I have been told (by
> >> TTers included) that God is not a man. Using your method of
> >> interpreting the Bible, Glenn, it would seem like God is obviously a
> >> man. Do you disagree??? And when you answer, please bear in mind
> >> that you said "If it CAN be taken literal it MUST be taken
> >> literal." If you say God is not a man, then who am I to believe,
> >> YOU or the Bible???
> >>
Michael D: Dave H, I am interested in finding out how did God become a man, and how did he become exalted to be God? I asked a couple of questions of you and Blainer yesterday to get a clear understanding of what LDS theology says about these things. I am picking up bits of answers as I read through the posts. Could you answer these for me?
Join the world�s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
Click Here
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
