|
From: "David Miller"
Judy wrote: > Tell me, where in all of scripture do you find > love defined as 'warm fuzzies' That's what they asked you. The implication from some of your
writings
is that if there are not attendant warm fuzzies, if the message does not sooth and tickle the ears, then something is wrong. jt: The above is an assumption made by some DavidM.
Noone ever asked
me - I would have explained. It was assumed
that this is what I meant and
this is a big problem in what calls itself the Church
today, everyone assumes
that others think like they do or if they don't then
they should.
Your comment here
suggests that we now have some agreement. We apparently agree that love is not defined as "warm fuzzies." Right? jt: Right!
Judy wrote:
> or where do you find a ministry of 'rebuking?' Both Ruben and Izzy presented evidence of such. I would like to
bring
up one person who they have not yet brought up. This would be the example of Stephen. jt: Stephen is a good example of confronting ppl with
their own failure and sin
but once again he illustrates my point which is a
point that so far noone on TT
seems to get. Who is Stephen addressing in Acts
7? God's ppl - right? The
children of Abraham - and even this is not their last
call, Paul tries to persuade
them for another 2-3yrs or more before he washes his
hands of their blood and
goes on to the Gentiles but
he doesn't do this until he has attempted to teach them
the whole counsel of God.
DavidM: Acts 7 records the last sermon of Stephen. We know that he
was a
good man, full of the Holy Ghost, and one who did many miracles among
the
people. The content of how he preached is recorded for us in Acts 7. While much of it was historical by nature, illustrating some common ground with those who heard him, how did his sermon end? Was it on a positive note such as you might find in a typical church on a Sunday morning with their tickling the ear three point sermons? Not hardly. His sermon concluded in rebuke, a rebuke that was not received. It was a rebuke that caused him to be killed. jt: Yes he was killed by the religious ppl who believed
they were serving God.
DavidM: I imagine that there were Christians in Stephen's day who also
thought
he was going about his message the wrong way. There were probably
some
who from a practical standpoint would argue that Stephen distanced himself
from
others. He should have used honey to attract them. What good
did it do Stephen
or Christianity for him to speak as he did? All he did was get
himself
killed, and for what? Do you realize how many people Stephen turned off from Christianity by speaking so belligerently toward the Jews? If he had just toned it down, he would have continued living and been able to attract many more people to Christianity than dying the way he did. This is how many people respond to the idea of a man of God rebuking sin. jt: I have no problem with Stephen, this was God's
timing and God's message.
What I have a problem with is spin-off, copycat
preachers who go out in the flesh
on their own. Many times I think these kinds of
"so called" ministries are an
excuse to vent anger that hasn't been dealt with in the
person's own life, but then
along with Paul I guess I can rejoice that the name of
Christ is named and God
will deal with the rest.
DavidM: Read carefully Stephen's conclusion. Imagine yourself being
one of
those listening to him, who considered the Temple to be the most holy place on earth, the very house where God dwelt, as promised in the Holy
Scriptures.
Put yourself in their position and imagine how biting and how unbiblical
the words
of Stephen sounded to them. Yes, it seems clear to me that Stephen
had a ministry
of rebuking (but he also loved the widows and fed them!).
jt: Don't know that I would call this one message "A
Ministry of Rebuking" but it
was directed at the right people and he was
supernaturally bold to give it.
DavidM: "Howbeit the most High dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as
saith
the prophet, Heaven is my throne, and earth is my footstool: what house will ye build me? saith the Lord: or what is the place of my rest? Hath not my hand made
all these
things? YE STIFFNECKED AND UNCIRCUMCISED IN HEART AND EARS, YE
DO ALWAYS RESIST THE HOLY GHOST: as your fathers did, so do ye. Which of
the prophets have not your fathers persecuted? and they have slain them
which shewed
before of the coming of the Just One; OF WHOM YE HAVE BEEN NOW THE
BETRAYERS
AND MURDERERS: Who have received the law by the disposition of angels, and
HAVE
NOT KEPT IT. When they heard these things, THEY WERE CUT TO THE HEART,
AND THEY GNASHED ON HIM WITH THEIR TEETH." (Acts 7:48-54 KJV)
Peace be with you.
David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. |
- Re: [TruthTalk] just the BIBLE Dave Blaine R Borrowman
- [TruthTalk] Polygamy David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] just the BIBLE Dave Blaine R Borrowman
- [TruthTalk] just the BIBLE Dave Judy Taylor
- RE: [TruthTalk] just the BIBLE Dave David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] just the BIBLE Dave/Judy irebukeu
- RE: [TruthTalk] just the BIBLE Dave Dean Moore
- RE: [TruthTalk] just the BIBLE Dave ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] just the BIBLE Dave Dave
- Re: [TruthTalk] just the BIBLE Dave Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] just the BIBLE Dave Charles Perry Locke
- RE: [TruthTalk] just the BIBLE Dave ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] just the BIBLE Dave Dave
- Re: [TruthTalk] just the BIBLE Dave Blaine R Borrowman
- RE: [TruthTalk] just the BIBLE Dave ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] just the BIBLE Dave irebukeu
- Re: [TruthTalk] just the BIBLE Dave Charles Perry Locke
- Re: [TruthTalk] just the BIBLE Dave Dean Moore
- RE: [TruthTalk] just the BIBLE Dave ShieldsFamily
- RE: [TruthTalk] Just the BIBLE Dave Dean Moore

