Charles Perry Locke wrote:
--DaveH,>From: Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>I recall that we have touched on this topic in the distant past,
DAVEH: I don't recall such......but frankly, I've been inundated by so many posts, I've had to shelve hundreds of them due to lack of time to respond. And.....this past summer was really a problem for me, as I simply had too much on my plate for most of the summer to participate in TT much. I've got a dozen responses started (some in reply to you, I think) that are sitting in my DRAFTS folder because I didn't have time to complete them.......I placed some of them there last year!
but my present comment was to indicate that you won't touch it today, not in the past. I have asked more than one LDS member about this in the past, and none have ever had a reasonable rebuttal.
DAVEH: OK Perry. Why don't you frame it in a simple question and I'll try to respond. Your original comment (that I responded to below) seemed to be rhetorical rambling, so I didn't feel compelled to say much more about it than I did. Clean it up a bit and start a new thread and I'll try to travel the path where you say other LDS folks fear to tread.....! :-)(But......please don't bury me with a bunch of garbage. I don't mind having a nice ----may I suggest, respectful?--- discussion, but I don't want to jump into the muck with you.)
Perry
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] just the BIBLE Dave
>Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:12:39 -0800
>
>
>
>Charles Perry Locke wrote:
>
> > DaveM, I do not think the official doctrine of the LDS church is
> > against polygamy...in the D&C the Mormon god says that any man who
> > does not practice polygamy is damned...and the mormon god never
> > revoked that command. They do not practice polygamy (at least mopst
> > don't) today simply because it is against the US law, and they
> > realized that if they continued in polygamy that the US Gov would come
> > down on them...so, they violate their own law of god, and they are
> > placing man's law above god's law. This is a telling inconsistency in
> > the LDS system, one of many against which LDS members are blinded.
> > DavidH won't touch this one.
> > DAVEH: ???? I do not recall ever discussing this.........When did
> > you ask, Perry???? You've certainly posted more than I can respond
> > to, so perhaps I've overlooked it.
> > He has no logical explanation.
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain Five email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.
