Re: [TruthTalk] [TruthTalk Digest]

[Dave]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  In a message dated 2/3/2004 1:49:22 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: (Furthermore......LDS theology teaches they could not have had children prior to the fall anyway.) Why do they teach this?  Laura DAVEH:  It is revealed in the BofM....... "And now, behold, if Adam had not transgressed he would not have fallen, but he would have remained in the garden of Eden.  And all things which were created must have remained in the same state in which they were after they were created; and they must have remained forever, and had no end. And they would have had no children; wherefore they would have remained in a s state of innocence, having no joy, for they knew no misery; doing no good, for they knew no sin. But behold, all things have been done in the wisdom of him who knoweth all things. Adam fell that men might be; and men are, that they might have joy."   2Ne 2:22-25 .......Does that answer your question, Laura?  Now let me ask you a couple.......IF Adam had not transgressed, he would have been immortal.  I assume you agree with that?  Then, do you believe immortal men and women can have children?  Now let me take it a step further......suppose Eve had partaken of the FF and had fallen, but Adam had not transgressed and remained immortal.   Do you think Adam (being in a higher state of immortality) could have had children with Eve (in a lower state of mortality)? -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.