Re: [TruthTalk] Read it and weep!

[Lance Muir]

'nor do I wish to' ahhhhhhhh the 'bondage' issue again! ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: October 07, 2004 04:06 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Read it and weep! In a message dated 10/6/2004 5:32:55 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And you do NOT make political remarks (such as the one below)? I cannot even imagine what you meant by it; nor do I wish to. Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 6:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Read it and weep!   your posts, in particular, display only radical political bias/es--no interest in biblical theology; e.g.,(a) biblical theology is conspicuous by its absence from your post, below   ftr, truth is conspicuous by its absence from politics, to which you appear to be addicted G can say whether I am close or not  -- but,   truth is conspicuous by its absence from politics   brings to mind the single most important aspect of politics  --- compromise, the very opposite of truth.  J