Good thoughts Slade and Terry; I understand about prejudice. Didn't someone say "Can anything good come out of Nazareth with regard to Jesus himself?  I don't doubt that Peter practiced his religion diligently and eating what was unclean would probably be akin to a Catholic eating meat on Friday several decades ago - but every male memorizing the whole Torah? In the Torah itself there is no mention of memorization.  In Moses day it was to be read to the people every seven years and their king was to have a copy of the scroll (to keep him humble).  The duty of priests was to teach the law to the people and to help them to discern or distinguish between the holy and the profane/clean and unclean.  judyt
 
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 21:49:49 -0500 Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
For what it's worth, in the tenth chapter of Acts, when Peter was in a trance and saw the sheet come down with all the food in it, God told him to eat.  Peter's response was that he had never eaten anything that was unclean.  That would indicate to me that he was familiar with some portion of the law, and if a portion, possibly all. 
Terry


Slade Henson wrote:
New Yorkers calling Arkansans inbred idiots doesn't mean they are. To read anything further is to strain at gnats. Please understand.
 
jt: You don't need to answer but I'm wondering why God's Word is wisdom only to those who live someplace
other than Galilee?  Unlearned says to me they have no education which is why they would appear ignorant.
 
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 05:42:42 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
If the disciples had memorized the whole Torah then how come the Saducees took note that they were "ignorant and unlearned men?" (Acts 4:13). 
 
Because they were from Galilee.
 

 

Reply via email to