The portion beginning 'could it be that..' was probably unnecessary unless 'one' (this one) missed the humorous intent therein.
I suspect, David, that you'll die living in utter denial re: the presence of an 'attitude' present within some of your posts
I recognize that I have an attitude in my posts. Everyone projects an attitude, whether it be humerous, light hearted, angy and upset, or serious and studious. I have noticed that the attitude of my posts is discerned to be different by different people. I have found that those who have met me and know me, like Izzy or Michael Douglas, perceive the attitude of my posts differently than those such as you and John S. They are always more accurate in understanding my true attitude, but that is because they know my personality and nature. They can better supply the unseen body language as they read the posts.
The caveat of e-mail communication is to be careful about not ascribing evil motives to the person whom you read. Without body language, it is too easy to jump to false conclusions.
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
