I am posting the following for clarification of a past post here.
I had characterized Joshua Holland in a certain way, and that post apparently was forwarded to Joshua Holland. He responded to me privately, and I post it here so that the facts concerning that past post can be established.
In a past thread, David Miller wrote:
"The person who is quoting this study, Joshua Holland, is not a conservative, pro-life person, but a smoking, wine-drinking, foul-mouthed lefty activist from liberal University of California."
Joshua Holland responded:
I'm a foul-mouthed lefty activist, and I smoke, but that doesn't mean I drink wine. And I go to USC, which is known as a very conservative school.
Best,
Joshua Holland Editor-in-Chief The Trojan Horse, USC's fiercely progressive voice of reason
I think describing USC as "conservative" is very much open to debate, but considering such to be a relative term, we could argue this one forever. In any case, the point stands concerning the leftist origin and bias of the article that was shared.
Peace be with you. David Miller.
p.s. For those who may not know, the term "progressive" is a euphemism for far left, liberal, socialist type philosophy. Progressive is a term that socialists use to describe themselves and their platform.
---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
