RE: [TruthTalk] The Schizophrenic God

[ShieldsFamily]

Isn’t that the same as saying the Constitution is a “living, breathing” document so the activist judges can circumvent the original intent?  Oh, well, this line is going nowhere—over and out. Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 9:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Schizophrenic God   In a message dated 11/28/2004 7:02:51 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Excuse me if I’m still a bit skeptical when you use the words “open dynamic theology”, John.  This is exactly the type of wording the liberal Supreme Court judges use when they want to change (read: trash) the original meaning of our “living, breathing” United States Constitution.  (Ever notice that?) Izzy I wasn't aware that the Supreme Court used "open dynamic theology" to negate precious court decisions>   Do you have an example? And  --   what does that have to do with my comments? John