Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2

[Kevin Deegan]

Why do we need a definition when Mormon Authorities have excluded themselves?

Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

ShieldsFamily wrote:

Several on this list claim they are speaking out of love, ala Yeshua.

 I say that they are decieved and lying when they do this.

Why else would they attack Dave Hanson(or any one else) for his beliefs. 

I pity you petty little people.

Jeff

 

Jeff, I believe you are committing ad hominem attacks here.  I am sure you cannot show us a single word of attack spoken against Dave Hanson; only against speaking of mormon theology as being truly Christian (which it isn�t�and if you think so, perhaps you should listen more to Perry

DAVEH:  Sorry for intruding on this, Izzy.  I've asked Perry (several times) for his definition of Christian, but he seems reluctant to mention anything except his disdain for my beliefs.  I've got no problem with his dislike of my faith, but I do find it curious that he refrains from posting a definition of Christian, especially when he disqualifies me of being one.   If I didn't know better, I'd say it's almost like a club that won't let you join IF you don't know the rules....and nobody will tell you the rules.

    BTW Izzy....how about you?  May I implore you to weigh in on this as well?  How do you define Christian?

and talk less?)  Therefore you are possibly guilty of your own accusations. Izzy

 

 

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.

---

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.