I don't have any "teachings" of my own John; my goal is
to agree with the "Teacher" and receive
and walk in His doctrine. If you call that "stupid"
then that is between you and the Lord. I would try
not to take it to heart but it would not be conducive
to any kind of fellowship because you would
have broken the royal law.
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:05:58 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, no problem with calling your teachings
stupid? Did you somehow overlook the purpose of my post. John
In a message dated 1/19/2005 6:41:04 AM Pacific
Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Why
not? We should be able to be Berean here which is to compare different
teachings alongside the Word of God
How does one insult a teaching it is either true or false and if false it needs to be brought to the light. If a person holding on
to it as truth is insulted then they are holding on too tightly and it is a chance to let go. Only truth will stand in that day.
I count only four contributors on this forum who apprently can't comply. 4 out of 14 contributors -- obviously it can be done.
And you don't overlook anything considered negative. Nothing. John
jt: Comply with what John? Is there some kind of rule book I don't know about? jt
How does one insult a teaching it is either true or false and if false it needs to be brought to the light. If a person holding on
to it as truth is insulted then they are holding on too tightly and it is a chance to let go. Only truth will stand in that day.
I count only four contributors on this forum who apprently can't comply. 4 out of 14 contributors -- obviously it can be done.
And you don't overlook anything considered negative. Nothing. John
jt: Comply with what John? Is there some kind of rule book I don't know about? jt
