ï
 
..orthodoxy is central to not only to sound teachg and preachg, but to the peculiarity of the KoG and its circle of Friends--unfortunately, that jt's (now your) notion of the WoG is 'orthodox' is suspect--restrictive..cultic..in some sense orthodoxy is accommodation; it must reasonably accomodate whatever biblical revelation, scripture, and preaching allows within the Church..e.g., acc to the biblical Apostles, the WoG restricts the Church only by whom it accomodates..e.g., 'God so loved the world..' 'whosoever will may come'..
 
 
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:56:37 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth (revisionist; jt could not teach 'the WoG' to anyone today apart from specific 20th c. representations she disparaged..this comment cloaks your own view of the WoG that it equates to the 16th-19th c. biblical lit and interpetation, in which, mainly current cult and political factions remain steepd)
 
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:54:01 -0500 "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Judy..stood up for the Word of God...attempted to help others reconcile their teachings with the Word of God.
 

Reply via email to