BLAINE:  Even when we are "sure" of something, it may turn out to be wrong.  
Rashly judging something such as the Shroud of Turin to be a fake, or the Book 
of Mormon, another example, puts one out on a limb from which it is sometimes 
difficult to extract oneself.  Called eating crow!

Turin Shroud Older Than Thought


The Shroud of Turin, the piece of linen long-believed to have been wrapped 
around Jesus' body after the crucifixion, is much older than radiocarbon 
tests suggest, according to new microchemical research.

Published in the 20 January issue of Thermochimica Acta, a peer-reviewed 
chemistry journal, the study dismisses the results of the 1988 carbon-14 
dating.

At that time, three reputable laboratories in Oxford, Zurich and Tucson, 
Arizona, concluded that the cloth on which the smudged outline of the body 
of a man is indelibly impressed was a medieval fake dating from 1260 to 
1390, and not the burial cloth wrapped around the body of Christ.

"As unlikely as it seems, the sample used to test the age of the shroud in 

1988 was taken from a rewoven area of the shroud. Indeed, the patch was very 
carefully made. The yarn has the same twist as the main part of the cloth, 
and it was stained to match the colour," says Raymond Rogers, a retired 
chemist from Los Alamos National Laboratories and former member of the STURP 
(Shroud of Turin Research Project) team of US scientists that examined the 
Shroud in 1978.

The presence of a patch on the shroud doesn't come as a surprise. The linen 
cloth has survived several blazes since its existence was first recorded in 
France in 1357, including a church fire in 1532.

Badly damaged, it was then restored by nuns who patched burn holes and 
stitched the shroud to a reinforcing cloth now known as the Holland cloth.

The latest research

In his study, Rogers analysed and compared the radiocarbon sample with other 
samples from the controversial cloth.

"As part of the STURP research project, I took 32 adhesive-tape samples 
from 
all areas of the shroud in 1978, including some patches and the Holland 
cloth. I also obtained the authentic samples used in the radiocarbon 
dating," Rogers says.

It emerged that the radiocarbon sample has completely different chemical 
properties than the main part of the shroud, Rogers says.

"The radiocarbon sample had been dyed, most likely to match the colour of 
the older, sepia-coloured cloth. The sample was dyed using a technology that 
began to appear in Italy about the time the Crusaders' last bastion fell to 
the Mameluke Turks in 1291.

"The radiocarbon sample cannot be older than about 1290, agreeing with the 

age determined by carbon-14 dating in 1988. However, the Shroud itself is 
actually much older," says Rogers.

Microchemistry reveals a different date

Evidence came from microchemical tests, tests that use small quantities of 
materials, often less than a milligram or a millilitre.

These revealed the presence of vanillin in the radiocarbon sample and in the 
Holland cloth, but not in the rest of the shroud.

Vanillin is produced by the thermal decomposition of lignin, a chemical 
compound of plant material including flax, and levels decrease and disappear 
with time. It is easily detected on medieval linens, but cannot be found in 
the very old ones, such as the wrappings of the Dead Sea scrolls.

"A determination of the kinetics of vanillin loss suggests that the shroud 

is between 1300 and 3000 years old," Rogers writes.

According to Tom D'Muhala, the president of the American Shroud of Turin 
Association for Research, the new chemical tests produced "conclusive 
evidence".

"They indicate that the linen shroud is actually very old, much older than 

the published 1988 radiocarbon date," D'Muhala says.

Shrouded in mystery

Scientific interest in the linen cloth began in 1898, when it was 
photographed by lawyer Secondo Pia. The negatives revealed the image of a 
bearded man with pierced wrists and feet and a bloodstained head.

In 1988, the Vatican approved carbon-dating tests. Three reputable 
laboratories concluded that the shroud was medieval, dating from 1260 to 
1390, and not a burial cloth wrapped around the body of Christ.

But since then a growing sense that the radiocarbon dating might have had 
substantial flaws emerged among shroud scholars.

The history of the cloth has been steeped in mystery. It has survived 
several blazes since its existence was first recorded in France in 1357, 
including a mysterious fire at Turin Cathedral in 1997.

Kept rolled up in a silver casket, it has been on display only five times in 
the past century. When it last went on display in 2000, more than three 
million people saw it. The next display will be in 2025.


Source: ABC.net.au
http://abc.net.au/science/news/stories/s1289491.htm

----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to