No look at the time line 1828 NO BoM yet No Church yet
Just the Necromancy that was a issue.
The fist vision was not even in print yet!
No partial stories in the paper yet either!
That is why he was invovled in the Methodist chuch he had not invented Mormonism yet.
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BLAINE: David said he had been "baptized" a member. I think he was just attending a class, and they tried to get him to commit to becoming a full-fledged member. That would have been a real trophy for the minister if he had succeeded in getting Joseph Smith to recant, huh?
When your name is on the roll you are a member.
The troubling part is this was in 1828 long after the first vision command to join none!
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
BLAINE: I ecall this being discussed. What I recall is something about JS being reproved by a Baptist minister, whose church JS had been attending with his sister. JS was not baptised as I recall, he just had his name put on the rolls by the minister, then had it taken off again later on.
David Miller wrote:
David Miller wrote:
There would be a historical reason.
Joseph Smith was baptized a Protestant
(Baptist), ...
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
