jt: Is this argument about how bad you can be and still
be used by God?
I found the list of "perverts" you posted which included Samson, Abraham, Paul, etc. to be
extremely offensive JD. Everyone you named repented and some are mentioned in the hall of faith (Hebrews 11) so why do
you keep identifying them with whatever failure they
endured and overcame?
You may not like the way Kevin communicates but his
point is well taken. God may use men who are
not totally perfected as yet but He never chooses perverts. When necessary
He works in spite of them. I wouldn't go so far
as to say God can not reach people using the newer versions but if they are to
grow into anything more than a baby believer they
will of necessity have to lay them aside beccause the devil, the blood, and
God's proper names will soon be history in them.
Your King James argument is invalid since he was not
personally involved in the translation. Commissioning it and participating
are not one and the same and God's Word was not bound by Pharisee and Saducee -
neither is it bound by the Church of England. judyt
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 00:33:44 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 2/19/2005 9:26:08 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 2/19/2005 6:08:14 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does God use SEX Petrverts &Heretics in translation?
Well, he sure used King James, didn't he. Your argument reminds me of a piece of Swiss cheese. So, stop cutting the cheese and cut to the chase ----------- list please.
JD
And, if no list, then how about dealing the King James issue I have included here. Or is this another issue that is beyond you? While you are thumbing your nose at everyone else and all other translations, you accept a pervert's bible, embrace its Episcopal heritage, embrace its dated phraseology and blindly move on to the next point. I already know you cannot do the list. So how about dealing with this King James thing? Let's see if we can get an answer from our Missionary Baptist opponent on that.
JD
