Re: [TruthTalk] vessels meet for masters use

[Knpraise]

In a message dated 2/22/2005 7:19:20 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I have Unity with those that are IN the Faith &IN Christ. I doubt it.   You list will not match up with anybodies and to date,  you have not denied that unity is based upon doctrinal (all blbical doctrine)  agreement.  The Fudamentalist Movement was founded by Baptists Presbyterians &Methodists. This is not true, either.   You forget that King James 1 was an "Evangelical Christian"  [apparently] many moons ago. They agreed on the Fundamentals, they had unity.  When it came to the Modernists they also agreed, that they were the ENEMIES of the Cross of Christ. Unity with error is conspiracy against God. To agree with liberals Modernists &antinomianNothings is to betray Christ. These groups are Humanist to the core. They are concerned with man and not with God.
 
Do you mean Merit Legalist? I pretty much say what I mean to say, Kevin.  A legalist, to me,   is anyone who believes that right action is the accountable issue God looks to in determining salvation.    We do not fear those legalist who hold this as a personal view.    But those leaders in the church who hold and teach this view really are anarchists and enemies of the risen Christ.  [there really is no other of talking to the right wing elitests]  Or is some private usage being observed here?  My view is a very commonly held  view.
Legalist has many meanings to many people but the true meaning is one who teaches salvation is merited by behavior.
Are you trying to draw a distintion between your antinomianism and those that have standards?   are you trying to be insulting or does it just come natually?