RE: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & Karl Barth

Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:36:18 -0800

Oh really?  Then from what were the ancient copied ms. made??? Izzy

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 10:27 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & Karl Barth

 

There were NO ORIGINALS!

----- Original Message -----

Sent: March 02, 2005 10:49

Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & Karl Barth

 

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 9:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Albert Einstein & Karl Barth

 

In a message dated 3/2/2005 6:44:33 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Terry, I believe that God not only gave inspiration thought by thought, but actually word by word.  Very precisely.  Just like in the OT, which has amazing “coincidences” in the wording.  Izzy


And why would you say this?   Are you aware that NT quotes are often NOT word for quotes of OT passages.   What does this mean about your theory of insoiration?
JD

 

Of course.  I was speaking of the original ms.  We do realize that we are reading English translations of such, and must therefore rely upon the best available sources. We don’t need to squabble about those again. Izzy

Reply via email to