jt: Amen and Amen.... It's impossible to do the above being comfortable in sin.
Sorry for the partial posting. I hit a keystroke that somehow caused my two open messages to be sent, one of which I had meant only to be copying and pasting from. Anyway, John, following is the third relevant post where you begin to accuse Judy of dishonesty. In all her posts, she never quoted you incorrectly. She may have misinterpreted what you were trying to communicate, but she has discussed the matter in all honesty as far as I can tell. You claim that she put you in quotes incorrectly. I have searched hard for it. I cannot find it. Put up or shut up about dishonesty being the reason you won't discuss the subject with her. Where did she misquote you? Please be honest with us and admit that she never misquoted you. She may have misrepresented your position because of a misunderstanding on her part concerning what you were trying to communicate, but she never misquoted you. In my opinion, Judy has been far more honest in this discussion than you have. How do you expect us to have a serious discussion with you when you have been so deceptive and dishonest with us?
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
----- Original Message -----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eternal Judgment
In a message dated 3/28/2005 8:50:13 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy, you need to stop saying this. I said nothing about being "comfortable in sin." I have made that clear -- your continued insistence is an intentional misrepresentation of what I believe or what I said. You are out to win the argument, not involve yourself in a truth search. And that is fine -- as long as you are honest in representing the other side. You are not.
I will feel no need to continue a discussion with someone who refuses to honestly discuss.
Jd
3/31/05 4:03 PST from John:
By the time this was written, she had been corrected several times without a complaint from me. The above, by this time in the discussion, is a reference to what I actually wrote ---------- "comfortable in sin" my quotes of her words. This is not in quotations but she is nonetheless misrepresenting me at this time and using three words of my post to Terry to make her point. She has chosen to disregard previous postings from me on that same morning and is now bent on convining others that I believe and teach that being "comfortable in sin" is a good thing. Where do you think she got these three words, David? Where did she get these three words? She cut them out of my post to Terry and reused them here.
She was asked by the moderator to refrain:
i agree, Pastor--jt, pls find a way to respond within the posted facts (or archived factual basis)�of the comments of other TT posters; intentionally misrepresenting�TT posts�offends ppl and diminishes�the�qualitiy of the discussions
�
ftr, these discussions would be served better by�authors�taking a win-win approach to�writing, esp while�participating�in a forum, a series of public dialogs, not a 'civil' war
�
g :: tt moderator
�
�
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:57:14 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
�your continued insistence is an intentional misrepresentation of what I believe or what I said.�
Although G's posted concern is directed at Judy, certainly the last part of that post is addressed to me (and all who will read it). She still has not acknowledged that "comfortable in sin" is NOT what I was saying. Be that as it may, let's move on. In fact, I am moving on. You can have the last word.
JD
