|
Hi DaveH, No Paul Hill did not represent
either God's zeal in our generation or any of the nine fruit of the Holy
Spirit.
This is why obedience is so important. God does
not use 'lone rangers' like Paul Hill who take the civil law into their own
hands and break the Royal Law.
Under the Old Covenant Israel as a nation were
told at different times to go out and defeat certain of God's
enemies. However, since the cross things have changed. Now we are
told that our enemies are spiritual and so are our weapons - God tells us
that "vengeance is His" and that He will repay. He
is well able to take care of abortionists. In fact I've seen one lady on
TV who used to manage an Abortion Clinic - She has come to the Light,
repented, and is now out there speaking for God; I think you would
agree that this brings Him a whole lot more glory.
I don't know if Paul Hill cursed ppl verbally and I
don't judge him personally, he was misguided and I've been there - It's
such a sad case - PH may have been well meaning but the ones left to suffer
are his wife and orphan children who I hope the Church is taking care
of. jt
On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 22:47:42 -0700 Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
- Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow way not " loving"? Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow way not " loving"? Dave Hansen
- Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow way not " loving"? Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow way not " loving"? David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow way not " loving"? Terry Clifton
- Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow way not " loving"? Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow way not " loving"? Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow way not " loving"? Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow way not " loving"? Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow way not " loving"? Lance Muir
- RE: [TruthTalk] Narrow way not " loving"? ShieldsFamily

