|
DAVEH: I don't know if you've been reading all my posts lately DavidM,
but while the resurrection was the point of Paul's discussion...it was
not the point of my posts on TT. As I see it, many Christians today believe that baptism is not a necessary component of salvation....whereas I view many Bible passages as evidence that many early followers of the Lord believed otherwise. When a perfect man....their Lord....explained that his baptism was to fulfill all righteousness, I believe his followers understood they needed to wash away their sins by baptism to fulfill all righteousness as well. There are quite a few Bible passages that reveal more than their obvious message. As do parables, many convey more than one message. And when looked at from an oblique angle, I believe much can be learned from looking beyond the explicit text. Yet when I point such out on TT, some view my comments as proof texting. If there were only one passage in support of such controversial interpretation of Scripture, the point might be easily dismissed. But when there are number of supporting passages that point to a logical conclusion contrary to popular thought, it seems to me that many TTers simply dismiss such assumed heretical thoughts by making excuses why the pertinent passages don't apply. Any time one looks beyond the apparent meaning of a verse, it seems there is an urgency to suppress any pondering of doctrinal theory that may contradict conventional thought. From my perspective, hard core Believers who narrow their focus in such a way tend to paint themselves into a corner. Hence they need to be extremely strict in their interpretation of many passages. By summarily rejecting underlying logical theology, could it be that much truth is avoided? David Miller wrote: DAVEH: -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS. |
- Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4 dead? Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4 dead? Dave Hansen
- Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4 dead? Lance Muir
- Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4 dead... Dave Hansen
- Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk]... Lance Muir
- Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Truth... Kevin Deegan
- Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [T... Dave Hansen
- Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [T... Kevin Deegan
- Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [T... Dave Hansen
- Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Truth... Dave Hansen
- Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4 dead? Dave Hansen
- Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4 dead? Charles Perry Locke
- [TruthTalk] Silence of Scripture David Miller
- RE: [TruthTalk] Silence of Scripture Charles Perry Locke
- Re: [TruthTalk] Silence of Scripture David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Silence of Scripture David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4 dead? David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4 dead? Dave Hansen
- Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4 dead? Dave Hansen
- Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4 dead? Dave Hansen
- Re: [TruthTalk] Baptism 4 dead? David Miller

