DAVEH:  I don't know if you've been reading all my posts lately DavidM, but while the resurrection was the point of Paul's discussion...it was not the point of my posts on TT. 

    As I see it, many Christians today believe that baptism is not a necessary component of salvation....whereas I view many Bible passages as evidence that many early followers of the Lord believed otherwise.  When a perfect man....their Lord....explained that his baptism was to fulfill all righteousness, I believe his followers understood they needed to wash away their sins by baptism to fulfill all righteousness as well. 

    There are quite a few Bible passages that reveal more than their obvious message.  As do parables, many convey more than one message.   And when looked at from an oblique angle, I believe much can be learned from looking beyond the explicit text.  Yet when I point such out on TT, some view my comments as proof texting.  If there were only one passage in support of such controversial interpretation of Scripture, the point might be easily dismissed.  But when there are number of supporting passages that point to a logical conclusion contrary to popular thought, it seems to me that many TTers simply dismiss such assumed heretical thoughts by making excuses why the pertinent passages don't apply.  Any time one looks beyond the apparent meaning of a verse, it seems there is an urgency to suppress any pondering of doctrinal theory that may contradict conventional thought.

    From my perspective, hard core Believers who narrow their focus in such a way tend to paint themselves into a corner.  Hence they need to be extremely strict in their interpretation of many passages.  By summarily rejecting underlying logical theology, could it be that much truth is avoided?

David Miller wrote:
DAVEH:
  
Yes, I understand that many societies and religions
believed in an afterlife.  That's not the point that
makes this discussion pertinent....but rather baptism.
    

Back up, Dave.  Read the context of the passage.  The resurrection is 
EXACTLY the point that makes this discussion pertinent.  He is pointing to 
baptism for the dead as an indication that even they have knowledge of the 
resurrection.  It is just like if I were to point to the pyramids that are 
all around them, and argue that such indicates a belief in the resurrection.

DaveH wrote:
  
How many other non Christian religions practice baptism
would be a more interesting question to consider.
    

It is not more important than the context of the resurrection.  You are 
straying from the text, isolating it, and discussing it away from the reason 
that Paul mentions it.

DaveH wrote:
  
So how do you weigh in on this, DavidM?  Do you think
those practicing baptism for the dead (1Cor 15:29) believed
they were followers of Christ?
    

We have discussed this before.  I don't know for sure, but Kevin's point 
that he referred to "they" instead of "we" is critical for understanding 
that Paul was not justifying their actions.  He was only justifying their 
belief in the resurrection, not the superstitions they practiced around that 
belief.  It seems very likely to me that these baptizers of the dead were 
not followers of Christ or Paul probably would have diverged enough to 
rebuke it.  On the other hand, if there was no concern that the Corinthians 
would think he condoned their practice, he could just mention it as 
supportive of a belief in the resurrection and move on.

Peace be with you.
David Miller. 


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



  

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.

Reply via email to